Kit Kowalski and Edie Wyatt talk about the world of sex and gender from a gender-critical perspective, not just the culture war, but law, policy, activism, feminism and all the nonsense.
KK's tweet was also about women having babies; as if that will make every woman happy.
As if women who can't have children will be "unhappy in the long-term".
It's womb-envy.
He thinks because he/his wife are currently high on oxytocin from Loving their Child, that women who don't become mothers are missing out.
But it's like when new parents post excessive amounts of photos of their newborns, and think everyone feels that same "Love-Chemical" - we don't.
Which is not to say anyone who feels nothing from baby-pics hates babies - babies are great.
But the world is terrible; for many, it doesn't feel an inspired place to 'populate'.
Some of us are here for different reasons, and different destinies.
The key to women's long-term happiness is for ALL women to be respected, safe, free, valued, appreciated, and not controlled by male-action, nor male-thought (or propaganda).
I think I had also just recently seen a video of a homeless woman giving birth on the streets of San Francisco; which also made me feel sick.
What kind of a horrid world is this.
Women's guaranteed safety would contribute greatly to my, personal, long-term happiness.
This is Konstantin Kisin's Tweet, that made me REALLY ANGRY for days.
I woke up screaming (in my head) about it.
What really bothered me, was his policing of Women's Behaviour; "Women are acting in ways..." that interfere with their "long-term happiness".
WHAT ABOUT THE EFFECTS OF MEN'S BEHAVIOUR ON THE LONG-TERM HAPPINESS OF WOMEN?! FFS...
Fathers are raping their daughters, and ruing their lives - most definitely ruining their "long term happiness".
(KJK made KK famous, anyway).
https://twitter.com/KonstantinKisin/status/1648037131686670353
He's definitely trying to bait feminists and to divide his audience with this tweet.
He also calls Mr Mulvaney "she".
I value his opinion, none.
KK's tweet was also about women having babies; as if that will make every woman happy.
As if women who can't have children will be "unhappy in the long-term".
It's womb-envy.
He thinks because he/his wife are currently high on oxytocin from Loving their Child, that women who don't become mothers are missing out.
But it's like when new parents post excessive amounts of photos of their newborns, and think everyone feels that same "Love-Chemical" - we don't.
Which is not to say anyone who feels nothing from baby-pics hates babies - babies are great.
But the world is terrible; for many, it doesn't feel an inspired place to 'populate'.
Some of us are here for different reasons, and different destinies.
The key to women's long-term happiness is for ALL women to be respected, safe, free, valued, appreciated, and not controlled by male-action, nor male-thought (or propaganda).
I think I had also just recently seen a video of a homeless woman giving birth on the streets of San Francisco; which also made me feel sick.
What kind of a horrid world is this.
Women's guaranteed safety would contribute greatly to my, personal, long-term happiness.